Home arrow Rey's Studies (Topics) arrow Uplook arrow Uplook Fridays:The Placarding of Christ
Uplook Fridays:The Placarding of Christ PDF Print E-mail
Written by Uplook.Org   
Friday, 15 July 2005

Bishop Lightfoot has a good word in place of the phrase "evidently set forth."(Gal 3:1) It is the word placarded. The Lord and His atoning work on the cross had been placarded before these Galatians. The message of His Person and work had been clearly demonstrated before them. But now they were falling back to the legalism of the Old Covenant. “O foolish Galatians!” What folly is this to leave Christ for Moses—the gospel for the law—justification by the righteousness of Christ which brings such solid comfort, for justification by the works of the law which could only bring their souls into bondage. The apostle was so astonished as to call them foolish or senseless.

The Emphasis on the Cross
Paul had placarded the cross before their eyes. We have often seen men carrying a large placard over their shoulders, hanging down front and back as a means of advertising. Paul had made “Christ crucified” as vivid and arresting as that to them.

The Old Covenant could never convey souls to heaven. It was too weak to open those bright gates. It was too feeble to ascend the hill of the Lord. If we seek acceptance of God by Sinai’s code, we must surely fail; it is folly to try it.

It is only the Lord Jesus and His atoning sacrifice on the cross which can make a way for us to heaven. On that cross He met every need. His finished work alone satisfies divine justice. He has given His life for mine. In Him—by Him—we clear the law’s uttermost demand. Such is the value of the Savior’s cross, and its value was made clear by the apostle to these Galatians.

The Scope of the Cross
The cross of our Lord Jesus embraces and affects the whole universe of God:

  1. The cross is the center of a believer’s life. Believers stand fearless on the rock of a completed sacrifice: “It is finished!” Human redemption is secured, an accomplished fact. Every payment has been made in full. Every penalty has been endured. The cursed cup has been drained. Satan has been vanquished. Believers are free. So to the Galatians the apostle could write, “God forbid that I should glory, save in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ,” and, “I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me” (Gal. 6:14; Gal 2:20).
  2. The cross is the center of the corporate assembly. The Lord has formed His Church by sovereign grace. He has planted it with His virtues, gifts, and graces. He waters it every moment. He has fenced it round with His almighty power. It is nourished with the refreshing doctrines of the gospel which are seasonably applied. It is impregnable against the forces of evil. Its faith, piety, and courage have spread to the ends of the earth. Because the cross is the center of the Church, “the gates of hell shall not prevail against it” (Mt. 16:18).
  3. The cross is the center of world history. Everything beforehand moved toward the cross; everything since flows from that cross. The whole world was sunk in ruin and misery, given over to idolatry and superstition. No distinction is made for any person of any race: “All have sinned, and come short of the glory of God” (Rom. 3:23). “They are all gone out of the way…there is none that doeth good, no, not one” (Rom. 3:12). But at the center of this ruined race, God has set forth a means whereby sin can be forgiven and guilt removed. That means is the cross of Christ which God has made a Mercy-seat.
  4. The cross is the center of the universe. There is a state of disorder in the whole cosmos. But the regeneration of the whole is promised so that there is to be a new heaven and earth. Through the blood of the cross, God will “reconcile all things unto Himself… whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven” (Col. 1:20).

The Reach of the Cross
It gives assent to His holiness. The one grand purpose of the scheme of grace is to guard and secure God’s holiness which is the very ground of His nature. Holiness was therefore manifest in our Lord’s life on earth. His walk in our soiled path was as clean as when He moved on celestial pavement. His every act—every word—have but one feature, and that is one of absolute holiness. The cross reaches up to heaven and secures that holiness. It thus gives God righteous ground on which to forgive sinful men.

It also reaches down to the bottom of human degeneracy. Some may ask, “Can holiness revive the wasteland of nature upon which the blight and curse of God rests?” Only by means of the cross! The Lord Jesus alone can make a wretched sinner holy and fit for the presence of the holy God. The Saviour welcomed is holiness begun. The Saviour cherished is holiness advancing. The Saviour never absent is holiness complete. Holiness complete is fitness for heaven. Only through the cross can man rise to that heaven of heavens where God is, and live in God’s holy presence without fear forever. O wondrous cross that can do that for us, and do it forever!

O perfect life of love!
All, all is finished now;
All that He left His throne above
To do—for us below.

And in His thorn-crowned head,
And in His sinless soul,
Our sins in all their guilt were laid,
That He might make us whole.

In perfect love He dies—
For me, He dies for me;
O all-atoning Sacrifice,
I cling by faith to Thee.

Yet work, O Lord, in me,
As Thou for me hast wrought;
And let my love the answer be
To grace Thy love has brought.
—Henry Williams Baker

From "Worship & Remembrance" by Daniel Smith. Published by Gospel Folio Press


Used by Permission. This material is protected by copyright. © 2005 Uplook Ministries.


Comments (9)Add Comment
...
written by Shane, July 15, 2005
"But now they were falling back to the legalism of the Old Covenant."

Brother Rey, not to contend, (And I realize you did not write this article.) but I do not see the "Old Covenant" was of legalism. Legalism is what men tend to do to any covenant. God gave the "Old Covenant". Simple as it may sound, it is true... to say that what God gave is legalism is to say that God is a legalistic deity that gave legalism! Similarly, the "Old Covenant" was not without the Gospel (Heb 4:2).

I do not recall a verse in Scripture that states the "Old Covenant" was salvation by works or even a "bad covenant". The fault was found with them (the people), not the Covenant (Heb8:8-9). It is the same covenant(Laws), written in our hearts (Eze 36). So would this then be writing legalism in our hearts?

It is this reason that you may notice my quotes around "old covenant" or "new covenant". I believe the language is better translated RE-newed Covenant. The Law is placed in our hearts.

We know that the Bereans used the Scriptures around the "Old Covenant" to prove Sha'ul and we know that if the Pharisees really believed Moses, they would have believed in Yeshua because he wrote about Him.

Many early Christians leaders understood the importance and meaning of The Law and that it was perfect, holy and just and good as Sha'ul wrote. I previously listed some quotes here: http://5twenty8.com/shane/?p=95 />
Our view of God's Law, His eternal Will, is our view of His character. What we believe about His Covenant ("old", "new" or renewed) states what we believe about Him.

Offering my perspective here and it took me some time to understand and accept what Adonai was telling me. I hope this does not read as bashing or divisive. Shalom!
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by Rey, July 15, 2005
Your welcomed comments are not divisive at all brother Shane. I re-read the article and I could see where the author’s writing may suggest something that is unbiblical. The writer may have done so unintentionally for I'm sure the author is not really meaning that to have the Law is to have Legalism. After all, David delighted in the Law in his heart. Your clarification that Men took what was the Law and made it something to take away the joy in others making a system of legalistic traditions is sound. It is evident in the letter to the Galatians that there was a legalism being enforced which dealt with aspects of the Law and were being put as requirements for attaining grace—this would still be legalism even by using the perfect and holy Law of God.

As for the Covenant being a renewed Covenant we have disagreed on this ground before. The Law is spoken of (in light of fallen humanity) as a schoolmaster, as death’s stepping stone, and the means for sin’s advantage. As per law in general, not the Law, but all law it has there is a component of what we must be doing and punishment for what we’re not doing. In Christ we died to law and live to Christ. This calling will wind up being a keeping of the Law at the highest levels…the interior of our being. So God writing the law in our hearts is not with the concept of condemnation, which the believer is no longer under, but with the heart of God transcribed in the heart of regenerated man. So now it is no longer “Thou shall not steal” but it is “If he steals your cloak give him a coat”. It is no longer “Set apart the Sabbath” but it is “Set apart every day.” Of course, you may disagree on this and I know we’ve disagreed on some of this before. smilies/smiley.gif
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by Rey, July 15, 2005
Of course, I'm not making an argument against keeping the Law out of conscience sake. Not at all. I hope people don't get that impression...
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by brian, July 15, 2005
I do not recall a verse in Scripture that states the "Old Covenant" was salvation by works or even a "bad covenant"


Depends on what you mean by "bad". In Rom. 7:12, Paul saya "So the law is holy, and the commandment is holy and righteous and good." But then in 2 Cor. 3:7 he calls it a "ministry of death". Not exactly what I would call "good".

I think it just depends on what perspective you look at it from.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by Shane, July 15, 2005
Concerning The Sabbath, my only question is, what verse states that? Repeatedly, HOW to obey The Sabbath was taken up by Yeshua. He told them to "stop judging by external standards and judge by true standards". The beattitudes fill fully commandments with their true meaning as you pointed out. Sabbath is not expanded that I can see.

Scripture repeatedly points out that it was His custom on Sabbath to go to the synagogue. What is absent is a passage of Him telling anyone that the Sabbath was changed or redefined or everyday.

Yeshua defined it truly, He rebuked the legalism man put on it. On the fourth day of creation, the lights were created for us to know His appointed times. And "Sabbath was created for man" and His Sabbaths would be a sign, "forever".

He did say, "is it not good to do good things on Sabbath", He did not say, "Sabbath is every day, therefore by your legalistic reasoning, you could never do go things".

The law that we were under is the law of sin and death. We are free from that law with the Law of Liberty written in us by acceptance of Yeshua HaMeshiach. Therefore by natural consequence of our love and obedience, with Him in us, we will want to keep the Law. The Law teaches us that WE cannot keep the Law, we must invite in us, the only One that can.

Phi 4:13 I have strength to do all, through Messiah who empowers me.


The Law must still exist or we cannot sin. 1 John tells us:

1Jo 2:4 The one who says, I know Him,Ӕ and does not guard His commands, is a liar, and the truth is not in him.

or my personal favorite:

1 Jo 5:2 By this we know that we love the children of Elohim, when we love Elohim and guard His commands. For this is the love for Elohim, that we guard His commands, and His commands are not heavy,

That "Law of Liberty" is freedom in The Law, not from The Law.

As for the "ministry of death", what I view there is a contradiction if accepted that way. I do not believe Paul is calling The Law good in one place and bad in another. This is a long study and a great book was written on all of this by Samuel Bacchiocci called "Sabbath Under Crossfire" in which he deals in great details Sha'ul's writings on The Law.

Since I have already taken up so much space, I will paste an excerpt from Sam's book on the ministry on death in the next comment. It is only a portion of what he make freely available anyway and falls under fair use.

Since emotion is void from written text, please read my words as loving discussion aimed at doing the will of our Lord and Messiah, Yeshua, the only salvation.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by Shane, July 15, 2005
The Ministry of Death and the Ministry of the Spirit. Paul develops further the contrast between the letter and the Spirit by comparing them to two different kinds of ministries: one the ministry of death offered by the Law and the other the ministry of the Spirit made possible through Christ’s redemptive ministry: "Now if the ministry that brought death, which was engraved in letters on stone, came with glory, so that the Israelites could not look steadily at the face of Moses because of its glory, fading though it was, will not the ministry of the Spirit be even more glorious? If the ministry that condemns men is glorious, how much more glorious is the ministry that brings righteousness! For what was glorious has no glory now in comparison with the surpassing glory. And if what was fading away came with glory, how much greater is the glory of that which lasts!" (2 Cor 3:7-11, NIV).

It should be pointed out first of all that Paul is speaking here of two ministries and not two dispensations. The Greek word used by Paul is "diakonia," which means "service" or "ministry." By translating "diakonia" as "dispensation," some translations (like the RSV) mislead readers into believing that Paul condemns the Old Covenant as a dispensation of death. But the Apostle is not rejecting here the Old Covenant or the Law as something evil or inglorious. Rather, he is contrasting the ministry of death provided by the Law with the ministry of the Spirit offered through Christ.

The ministry of death is the service offered by the Law in condemning sin. Paul calls this a "ministry of condemnation" (2 Cor 3:9) that was mediated through Moses when he delivered the Law to the people. The ministry of the Spirit offers life and is made available through Christ (cf. Heb 8:6; 9:15; 12:24). Both ministries derive from God and, consequently, are accompanied by glory. The ministry or service of the Law coming from God was obviously glorious. This was evident to the people by the glory which Moses’ countenance suffused when he came down from Mount Sinai to deliver the Law to the people. His countenance was so bright that the people had difficulty gazing upon it (Ex 34:29-30).

The ministry or service of the Spirit rendered by Paul and other Christian preachers is accompanied by greater glory, that is, the light of God’s Spirit that fills the soul. The reason such ministry is more glorious is that, while the glory reflected in Moses’ face at the giving of the Law was temporary and gradually faded away, the glory of the ministry of the Spirit is permanent and does not fade away. Through His Spirit, God has "made His light shine in our hearts to give us the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ" (2 Cor 3:6, NIV).

Cranfield correctly summarizes the point of these verses, saying: "Since the service rendered by Moses at the giving of the Law, which was actually going to effect ‘condemnation’ (2 Cor 3:9) and ‘death’ (2 Cor 3:7), was accompanied by glory (the glory on Moses’ face—Ex 34:29ff), the service of the Spirit rendered by himself (and other Christian preachers) in the preaching of the Gospel must much more be accompanied by glory."26

Paul’s aim is not to denigrate the service rendered by the Law in revealing and condemning sin. This is indicated by the fact that he calls such service a "glorious" ministry: "If the ministry that condemns men is glorious . . ." (2 Cor 3:9, NIV). Rather, Paul’s concern is to expose the grave error of false teachers who were exalting the Law at the expense of the Gospel. Their ministry was one of death because by the works of the Law no person can be justified (Gal 2:16; 3:11). Deliverance from condemnation and death comes not through the Law but through the Gospel. In this sense, the glory of the Gospel excels that of the Law.

The important point to note here is that Paul is contrasting not the Old and New Covenants as such, rejecting the former and promoting the latter; rather, is he is contrasting two ministries. When this is recognized, the passage becomes clear. The reason the glory of the Christian ministry is superior to that of Moses’ ministry, is not because the Law given through Moses has been abolished, but because these two ministries had a different function with reference to Christ’s redemption.

The comparison that Paul makes in verse 9 between the "ministry of condemnation" and the "ministry of righteousness" clearly shows that Paul is not disparaging or discarding the Law. "Condemnation is the consequence of breaking the Law; righteousness is precisely the keeping of the Law. The Gospel is not Lawless. It is the ministration of righteousness to those who because of sin are under condemnation. And this righteousness is administered to men solely by the mediation and merit of Christ, who alone, as the incarnate Son, has perfectly obeyed God’s holy Law."27
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by Rey, July 16, 2005
Concerning The Sabbath, my only question is, what verse states that? Repeatedly, HOW to obey The Sabbath was taken up by Yeshua. He told them to "stop judging by external standards and judge by true standards". The beattitudes fill fully commandments with their true meaning as you pointed out. Sabbath is not expanded that I can see.


Brother, I’ll have to respond to this Sabbath point in a full post. It’s much longer than what is seen here…just know that I was not saying that God changed the Sabbath and imbued it with new meaning. My example was more a point of opposites. Stealing versus giving back twice as much. It still maintains the spirit of not stealing but now it goes above over and beyond. To show the full outworking of this I’ll need to devote a full post.

As for the article, good stuff mostly. I agree with it right until the author reaches his conclusion:
"Condemnation is the consequence of breaking the Law; righteousness is precisely the keeping of the Law. The Gospel is not Lawless. It is the ministration of righteousness to those who because of sin are under condemnation. And this righteousness is administered to men solely by the mediation and merit of Christ, who alone, as the incarnate Son, has perfectly obeyed God’s holy Law."

The righteousness mediated by Christ is not the righteousness of the Law…but the righteousness of God. There is a huge difference in God’s righteous requirements for men to each other and Himself and the righteousness found in the triune God who is perfectly loving, perfectly righteous and perfectly glorious. The author makes some good points but to say, in effect, that the righteousness imputed is that keeping of the Law by the Son falls short of the incomparable act which God has accomplished.

Look to a Sabbath post or series of posts to come. And brother, I never felt that you were speaking harshly. Indeed, I love our conversations exactly because of your strong conviction, reliance on Scripture and respect of conscience. God bless you.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by brian, July 16, 2005
Rey - I'll look forward to your posts on the Sabbath and will hold off on my comments on that subject until then.

As I see it, one of the issues is not are we under Law(we are), but rather which Law are we under. That really needs to be made clear beacuse the word "Law" is used to refer to so many different things. Because when Shane says...

Therefore by natural consequence of our love and obedience, with Him in us, we will want to keep the Law.


...I'm not entirely sure I know what he's including as part of thet "Law". Although I'm pretty sure it at least partially refers to some commands from the Old Covenant - which I would say have no authority over us.

This could get quite interesting, eh? smilies/smiley.gif
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by Shane, July 16, 2005
Rey, I don't disagree with your expansion on The Sabbath in meaning at all. But it is when the specific days and calendars are changed that I have an issue. Daniel warns of this and every calculation of "holy" days, months, years, clocks, that we use is Roman, not Biblical. Remember when I stated the purpose of the fourth day of creation was for His appointed times? The Sabbath was/is a gift to us. Created for man, not for just Jews.

As far as having authority over us, I must assume that means non-Jews? For Messianics still follow the Torah (Law). (A point for clarification on my part is that I will refer to the Law as Torah, the first five books of Scripture.)

The problem with the idea of Torah not having authority over us is Acts 15 for one quick example. It is a chapter with things that Gentiles do not do, yet it is directly written to Gentiles. I don't know of any Gentile denomination that eats Kosher meats. Yet is is clearly prescribed there by the apostles. Apostolic examples are given for everything from Sunday observance to "Pentecost", yet everyone is content to forske this example (Blood) straight from the Torah.

Acts 15 also states that the Gentiles would learn more about Torah... every Sabbath. The Bible will never support Sunday keeping or even address it at all. This didn't occur until the second century. Even more proof is quite simply the Bereans. They did not use the "New Testament" to prove Sha'ul because it did not exist. So, they could never prove that Sunday was now the day of worship.

I am not saying that Rey is stating that it is, I am just making it general. Keeping the Sabbaths (weekly, Passover, etc.) as they are commanded in no way diminishes the everyday application. It amplifies it. One full day, sundown to sundown it set-apart for Him as He commanded.

Again, an example of Torah is Passover ("communion"), there is only one way to understand this event, and that is that it was Passover. It was commanded and Yeshua kept it repeatedly over His life. There is an application here for after the cross!!! Most Christians are unaware of this because they do not celebrate Passover. I say with full confidence that anyone goes through a Passover seder will think, wow, Easter doesn't even come close to this.

Another example is tithing which Yeshua said to contimue, this is Torah.

Love thy neighbor... Torah.

I have written posts about the Sabbath and am in the midst of another series that I need to keep on with. There is a tremendous importance to His calendar and (all of) His Sabbaths. In other words, I do not believe in a literal (meaning a chip or tattoo) "mark of the beast".

This gets into the mother of harlots and who those harlots are, and this is where people get pricked. I know because I was pricked. Pricked is good it means you care! I think I'll end here though as I feel very strange talking about Rome and harlots on someone else's site. Feel confident thought that I am not part of any cult. I believe in Scripture and salvation only through Yeshua. I do believe that there must be evidence of this though ...

Mat 7:22 “Many shall say to Me in that day, ‘Master, Master, have we not prophesied in Your Name, and cast out demons in Your Name, and done many mighty works in Your Name?’
Mat 7:23 “And then I shall declare to them, ‘I never knew you, depart from Me, you who work lawlessness!’


Shabbat Shalom! smilies/smiley.gif
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smile
wink
laugh
grin
angry
sad
shocked
cool
tongue
kiss
cry
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
< Prev   Next >