What’s the Point of the Book?
Gibbs seeks to write an explanation of baptism that will be a “blessing to all the people of God”, so that they may be “brought to a greater realization of the importance of the subject” and therein have a “deeper appreciation of the tremendous spiritual significance involved in this divinely appointed ordinance”. Basically he wants to explain Baptism, the purpose of it, different interpretations of it and a justification of his own beliefs on the matter.

The Good?
The book was inexpensive, costing me $8 for a new copy. The book is a somewhat short read with 254 pages that includes hymns and index. The relatively short title is loaded with verses and explanations thereof, sometimes dividing the examination of a verse across chapters. The easy pacing and numerical tabulation of the arguments make the reading easy to grasp and progress in. The book portrays alternate positions and explains why the positions take the stances that they do. In some cases the author even quotes opponents agreement with his own position.

The Bad?
I love A.P. Gibbs so don’t take these comments as a slam against him. I’m trying to honestly assess the book. Gibbs sometimes pushes away an opponents arguments by first stating that the argument doesn’t agree with the general teaching of Scripture and then pointing at a “well known Bible teacher” (often Ironside) in support of his position. Thing is, he states that the general teaching of Scripture is his position. So it’s something like this.

R is the general teaching of Scripture on Baptism and it is true
P doesn’t work with R
P is false.
{X Teacher} agrees that P is false and R is true
Therefore R is true.

There’s several other fallacies throughout the piece like this. At other points Gibbs might support his argument by pulling something right out of context and applying it to the present discussion. For instance, after arguing how the Church is not in the Old Testament he supports not messing around with what the church (local) is supposed to do by looking at Moses who built the tabernacle according to the pattern God had shown him. There’s a valid point there, but I just feel he got there the wrong way. Lastly, the book should have been longer and really fleshed out some of these positions instead of, in some cases, relying on fallacious argumentation.

The Ugly?
This is purely stylistic and you may disagree with this assessment. Most of the time, you’ll notice that the Ugly section may be seriously subjective. My wife, for instance, disagrees with me on this following point. In this title, Gibbs tends to stop the flow of thought by breaking into a hymn or quoting a verse fragment. This may be a Brethren style though, since I’ve often noted that they/we skew devotional whenever considering portions of Scripture. I’m completely two-faced about this though since I may delve into the same sort of thing though I try to keep from expressing it until somewhere near my conclusion. The Jacket is horrendous. It screams 60's.

Star Rating
So the book gets three stars with the understanding that theologically you may disagree with it if you are into paedobaptism or Covenant Theology. It’s a Could Read since I doubt it will change your position if you’re entrenched in your theology but know that it doesn’t claim to do so. Its goal is to bless, and with that understanding, enjoy the read.

-r-

Comments (0)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

Name

Website

Comment

smaller | bigger

Subscribe via email (Registered users only)

I have read and agree to the Terms of Usage.

Write the displayed characters

Add Comment