Home arrow Rey's Reviews arrow Lingamesh and the Fallacy Files
Lingamesh and the Fallacy Files PDF Print E-mail
Written by Rey   
Friday, 14 April 2006

Lingamesh has a great series on Logic and Fallacies going on over at his blog…which spurred some (likely flawed) personal thinking in using a deductive argument on top of an inductive reasoning process. I’m wondering how often we do this with theological statements and doctrinal outlines. Go on over and have a look see (specifically the comments of this post for my questions).

Comments (2)Add Comment
...
written by Jim Purcell, June 29, 2005
I was saved while attending a university, and immediately wanted to pursue theological studies at a Bible College. My parents were not pleased but said that if in a year I still felt the same way they were willing. That left me a year in which to take as many courses at the University of Nebraska which I felt would further my serving God. I was a new believer and some of my choices didn't help at all, but two did. I studied classical Greek which was fantastic. And I threw in Philosophy 101. Which was,
An introduction to Logic,
I have to say, this course has been incredibly helpful over and over. It taught proper thinking. Now, over the years I've had several debates with men of God, and I mean real men of God who thought it was rubbish. But that's not what I've found. I think the subject of logic, deductive even more than inductive, belongs in the quiver of every person who is seriously trying to study the Scriptures!
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by Rey, June 30, 2005
I think both methods are helpful but I question laying a deductive reasoning process over something that is based on an inductive framework.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smile
wink
laugh
grin
angry
sad
shocked
cool
tongue
kiss
cry
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
< Prev   Next >