Home arrow Rey's Studies (Topics) arrow Answer Back arrow The Way Paint Fumes Effects Concepts of Election
The Way Paint Fumes Effects Concepts of Election PDF Print E-mail
Written by Rey   
Sunday, 09 April 2006

Something else I was just thinking, this time about election and predestination. A common charge against Arminianism that I’ve heard is that basing God’s election on Man’s decision in time makes salvation dependant on Man. Now, I actually agree with that, but I was just thinking how the same charge can be leveled at (some) in the Calvinist camp.

Now, some say that God chooses those who are to be saved and leaves the rest in their position to receive their due reward. Thing is that has God looking down the corridors of time and picking people that are to be saved. It’s still man-centered in that the people exist independently of God and he chooses which ones to save. Kind of like me going into a room and saying “those marbles there, they are mine” but the marbles are there. They exist independently of me.

Of course, there’s yet another position that can have God saying “I will make this a vessel of mercy” and “I will make this a vessel of wrath” which would allow God choosing to do what He wants to do by orchestrating every detail down to the minutiae of sin in a life. Some folk would see this as heretical, others as hyper-Calvinist but it is consistent in that it allows the Gospel to be completely God centered. This would be me making the marbles and saying which ones are mine before I make them.

Then there’s another group that says God chooses to make certain individuals before the foundation of the world, forming them to be vessels of honor and the others he allows makes but allows them to set themselves up for perdition. This still keeps the Gospel as God-centered (because it makes God involved in the details of certain individuals) but it leaves the condemnation element independent of God (they condemn themselves). Now this allows God to expose the rest of the world to the gospel, ensuring a deeper condemnation for the hearers of the message and maintaining his righteousness. This would be making certain marbles and allowing marbles to grow around them and me knowing which marbles are mine.

Thing is, that winds up having a certain group independent of God—or does it? Arminianism is man-centered. Some common Calvinist positions are man-centered. Other common Calvinist positions are semi-man-centered. And the hyper-Calvinist position is completely God-Centered...but doesn't sound very kosher up against Scripture. I don’t know…more paint fumes, and me losing my marbles.


Comments (1)Add Comment
...
written by PhilThreeten, June 14, 2005
Rey - All good points. That's why I think we have misappropriated individual election. It doesn't exist - well, not in the traditional sense. Nowhere in Scripture does it speak about an individual being elect other than Jesus. Thus, God's act of election in eternity past is towards Jesus (keeping everything God-centered). When we are placed in Jesus we receive all the blessings and positions that are His (obviously, without becoming God). Thus, we are elect (we could even say individually elect) but not becuase God individually chose me but because God individually chose Jesus and I am in Him. God did know this from eternity past and so there is a sense in which His foreknowledge recognizes us as either elect or vessels of wrath from eternity past - but the act of election seems focused not on individual mankind but on Jesus and mankinds association or lack thereof with Him.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smile
wink
laugh
grin
angry
sad
shocked
cool
tongue
kiss
cry
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
< Prev   Next >